Station I
A Truth Universally Acknowledged
Volume I · Chapter 1
An envelope on a breakfast table at Longbourn — the arrival of a single piece of news by which an entire family's weather is about to change.
« It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife. »
No novel in English has ever opened with a more ironic sentence, and it is a sentence that does its work by being exactly the sort of thing it pretends not to be. A truth universally acknowledged. Put on a serious face. Now — a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife. The stately cadence says: this is a philosophical claim. The content says: what the neighbourhood actually wants is his money, and the neighbourhood has daughters.
The sentence should be read as a joke told slowly, with a straight face, by a narrator who knows exactly how much the joke is costing the people inside it. Because what the sentence is quietly announcing is the economic basis of the entire book. The Bennet family has five daughters and no son. Their estate is entailed — it will, at Mr Bennet's death, pass to a distant male cousin. Mrs Bennet, who is the book's most laughed-at character and also, underneath, the character whose anxieties drive most of the plot, has therefore the following problem: if she cannot marry her daughters off to men with money, her daughters will be poor, possibly destitute, certainly without position. She is silly. She is also correct about her predicament.
Austen opens the novel by placing this truth at its most universal and most bland — as if everybody agreed, as if nobody were embarrassed — and then immediately shows us the Bennet breakfast table. Mr Bennet, retreating into irony. Mrs Bennet, agitated about the news that a young man named Bingley has taken Netherfield Park. Jane, silent and lovely. Elizabeth, listening and amused. Lydia, Kitty, Mary, barely individuated yet. The sentence of the opening is already being enacted. A rich young man has arrived. A mother has begun calculating.
Austen's real subject is not romance. Her real subject is how to survive, with dignity, inside an economy in which marriage is the only career available to a woman of the gentry. Elizabeth, whom we have not quite met, will turn out to be the book's test case. She will be asked to marry not one but two men for financial security. She will refuse both. She will, at enormous risk to herself and to her sisters, hold out for something very specific — a marriage in which she can respect and like the man — and she will, in one of the rarest happy endings in English fiction, be rewarded for it.
But nothing in the first sentence promises this. What the first sentence promises is that the marriage market will be discussed with the calm of an economic treatise and with the comedy of a farce, simultaneously, for the next three hundred pages. The gift of the sentence, and of the book, is that these two registers — the ironic and the sincere — will never once be separated.
Austen's real subject is not romance. It is how to survive, with dignity, inside an economy in which marriage is the only career available to a woman of the gentry.
Every parody of this sentence — and there have been thousands — misses the two-part motion. The solemn first half exists only to carry the second half's knife.